Newsletter

Subscribe to never miss an update in mobile app marketing.

Login
Get Started
Book a Demo

MobileAction’s 2026 Apple Ads benchmark report

detail img

Product page ads

Product page ads reach users at a different moment than Search tab or Today tab ads: they appear while people are already exploring apps on the App Store and actively comparing alternatives. Because these placements show up on other apps’ product pages (most commonly within the “You Might Also Like” area), they function as a competitive visibility layer, helping advertisers surface next to relevant category peers and intercept consideration-stage demand.

From a user-intent perspective, product page ads tend to capture audiences who are deeper in evaluation. By the time a user scrolls through an app’s listing, they’ve likely reviewed key visuals and messaging and are looking for “the next best option” to evaluate. This makes product page ads particularly effective for conquesting and for reinforcing differentiation, since creative choices and page alignment can influence whether users continue browsing or convert.

 

  • Product page ads continued to deliver strong engagement in 2025, keeping TTR above 3% in every quarter and closing at 3.39% in Q4, which signals that users browsing “You Might Also Like” placements still actively explore relevant alternatives.
  • Conversion rates stayed steady in a tight band throughout the year, ranging from 17.09% (Q3) to 18.87% (Q1), suggesting consistent download intent even when discovery happens later in the decision journey.
  • The cumulative averages for 2025 settled at 3.28% TTR and 17.99% CR, reinforcing that Product Pages Browse remains an intent-rich placement, especially when app-to-app relevance is high.
  • CPT was highest in Q2 at $1.02, then eased back to $0.93 in Q4, which can indicate peak-season bidding pressure mid-year, followed by more efficient traffic costs as campaigns and targeting matured later in the year.
  • CPA peaked in Q3 at $5.67 and ended at $5.26 in Q4, highlighting that the placement can require tighter conversion alignment when competition increases or when targeting expands to broader competitor sets.
  • The Q2–Q3 pattern (higher CPT, higher CPA) typically aligns with advertisers pushing more aggressively into competitor and complementary app audiences, where visibility is attainable but efficiency depends heavily on message match and differentiation.
  • Because product page ads appear while users are actively evaluating options, creative-message fit matters as much as bids; aligning the tap destination to the user’s context (for example, emphasizing a specific feature advantage vs. the competitor set you target) can help protect CR as costs fluctuate.
  • For Apple Ads account structure, product page ads often perform best when split into focused ad groups by competitor clusters (direct competitors vs. adjacent alternatives) so bids, CPT ceilings, and CPA targets can reflect each cluster’s true competitiveness.
  • When CPAs rise, the fastest lever is usually tightening relevance, not simply lowering bids; narrowing the targeted apps/categories to the most comparable audiences can keep TTR healthy while improving downstream efficiency.

The data in this report has been gathered using MobileAction and SearchAds.com tools.*

"Product page ads in 2025 behaved like a true comparison-stage placement: users consistently tapped on alternatives when the context made sense, keeping TTR above 3% all year and lifting it to 3.39% in Q4 (3.28% average), while conversion barely moved, staying clustered between 18.87% in Q1 and 17.09% in Q3 (17.99% average). That combination suggests the placement’s traffic quality held up even as the competitive landscape shifted."
Alaattin Yerturk
Alaattin Yerturk
Client Team Lead @MobileAction